Skip to content
K Knidox Search…
Astronomy · Cosmology

Redshift to Velocity Calculator

Turn a redshift z into a recession velocity — relativistic and low-z.

The fractional shift in wavelength, z = Δλ ÷ λ. Must be 0 or greater.
Examples — tap to load
Recession velocity (relativistic)
28,487km/s

≈ 0.095c. Low-z approximation v ≈ c·z = 29,979 km/s — this overestimates the true velocity, badly so at high z.

Velocity vs redshift — linear approximation vs relativistic (only relativistic stays below c)
Two curves of recession velocity as a fraction of c against redshift z from 0 to 3: the linear approximation v = cz rises straight past 1.0, exceeding the speed of light, while the relativistic curve levels off and stays below c.3 c0z = 0z = 3
RelativisticLinear v = cz

A redshift of z = 0.1 gives a recession velocity of about 28,489 km/s — roughly 0.095c — using the relativistic Doppler formula v = c·((1+z)² − 1) ÷ ((1+z)² + 1). The simple low-z estimate v ≈ c·z = 29,979 km/s overestimates it, and that error grows large at high z.

What redshift tells you

When a source moves away from us, its light is stretched to longer, redder wavelengths. Redshift z = Δλ ÷ λ measures that stretch. For small z the recession speed is almost proportional to redshift, v ≈ c·z, but that shortcut fails as z climbs because velocity can never reach the speed of light. The relativistic Doppler formula keeps the answer physical for every z.

v = c · ((1 + z)² − 1) ÷ ((1 + z)² + 1)

c = 299,792.458 km/s · low-z approximation: v ≈ c·z (overestimates at high z)

Worked example

Take a galaxy at redshift z = 0.1 and find its recession velocity relativistically:

  1. 1
    Compute (1 + z)². For z = 0.1, (1 + 0.1)² = 1.1² = 1.21.
  2. 2
    Form the velocity ratio. v ÷ c = (1.21 − 1) ÷ (1.21 + 1) = 0.21 ÷ 2.21 = 0.095.
  3. 3
    Multiply by the speed of light. v = 0.095 × 299,792 ≈ 28,489 km/s, about 0.095c.
  4. 4
    Compare with the shortcut. The low-z estimate v ≈ c·z = 29,979 km/s runs ~5% high here, and much higher for large z.

Redshift → velocity: linear vs relativistic

The linear estimate v ≈ c·z equals or exceeds c once z ≥ 1 — physically impossible. The relativistic value always stays below c.

Redshift zLinear (c·z)RelativisticRelativistic v ÷ c
0.012,998 km/s2,983 km/s0.010c
0.129,979 km/s28,489 km/s0.095c
0.5149,896 km/s115,305 km/s0.385c
1299,792 km/s (= c)179,875 km/s0.600c
2599,585 km/s (> c ✗)239,834 km/s0.800c

Cosmological redshift, Doppler, and Hubble’s law

Redshift is not always a simple Doppler shift. For nearby objects the redshift really is a velocity effect, and the Doppler formula above applies. For distant galaxies the redshift is mostly cosmological — the space between us and the source has expanded while the light was in transit, stretching the wave. Astronomers still often quote a “recession velocity” from the Doppler formula, but it is an interpretation, not a literal speed through space.

Why v can’t exceed c. The special-relativity Doppler formula is built so that v ÷ c approaches 1 only as z → ∞. No finite redshift ever yields a Doppler velocity at or above the speed of light, which is why the linear shortcut — giving 2c at z = 2 — is clearly wrong at high z.

Hubble’s law is approximate. The rough distance d = v ÷ H₀ (with H₀ ≈ 70 km/s/Mpc) is a first estimate only. The precise distance depends on the expansion history of the universe, and at high z different distance measures diverge, so treat any single figure as an order-of-magnitude guide.

What is redshift?
Redshift z is the fractional stretch of a wavelength, z = Δλ ÷ λ. Light from a receding source is shifted toward longer, redder wavelengths, and larger z means a larger shift.
When can I use the simple v ≈ c·z formula?
Only at low redshift, roughly z below 0.1, where it agrees with the relativistic result to a few percent. At z = 0.1 it already runs about 5% high, and beyond that the error grows quickly.
Why can’t the velocity exceed the speed of light?
The relativistic Doppler formula makes v ÷ c approach 1 only as z tends to infinity, so no finite redshift ever gives a velocity at or above c. The linear estimate ignores this and wrongly returns 2c at z = 2.
What is the difference between Doppler and cosmological redshift?
A Doppler redshift comes from motion through space and applies to nearby objects. A cosmological redshift comes from the expansion of space itself stretching the light in transit, and it dominates for distant galaxies.
How do I estimate distance from redshift?
A rough Hubble-law estimate is d = v ÷ H₀ with H₀ ≈ 70 km/s/Mpc. A z = 0.1 galaxy at ≈ 28,489 km/s sits at roughly 407 Mpc, but this is only an order-of-magnitude figure.
Does this handle blueshift or negative z?
No. The calculator requires z ≥ 0, which covers receding sources. A blueshift (approaching source) has negative z and needs the Doppler formula with the opposite sign of velocity.